Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Barak may have been Diebold

Diebold favors Hillary, hand count for Obama

I used the Comma delimited database: NH municipalities hand count vs use Diebold machines from to see if there was a deviation between the results from precincts which used hand counts and those which relied on Diebold machines. The results were astonishing. :

Updated: 5:05 AM (EST) - Results tallied for 209 out of 236 of the municipalities.

By Percentage

Method Hillary Clinton Barack Obama
Diebold Machines 53.23% 46.77%
Hand Count 47.47% 52.53%

By Votes

Method Hillary Clinton Barack Obama
Diebold Machines 82860 72807
Hand Count 18898 20912

By Number of Municipalities Won

Method Hillary Clinton Barack Obama
Diebold Machines 54 33
Hand Count 43 77

About 81% of the votes will be "counted" by the Diebold machines.

Original article posted here

Other Pre-Election Numbers, For Republicans and Rest of Dems, Nearly Dead on the Money...

[UPDATED several times at end of article, and still developing with new updates...]

I'm not sure why Obama would have conceded so soon, given the virtually inexplicable turn of events in New Hampshire tonight.

What's going on here? Before proceeding, I recommend you read the third section of the post I just ran an hour or so ago, concerning the way the ballots are counted in New Hampshire, largely on Diebold optical-scan voting systems, wholly controlled and programmed by a very very bad company named LHS Associates.

Those Diebold op-scan machines are the exact same ones that were hacked in the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy. See the previous report, as I recommend, which also includes a video of that hack, and footage of the guy who runs LHS Associates.

That said, the the pre-election pollster's numbers (NOTE: that's not Exit Polls, but Pre-Election Polls!) were dead-on, for the most part, on the Republican side, as well as on the Democratic side. Except in the do-or-die (for Hillary) Clinton v. Obama race. I'm watching MSNBC right now, and they all seem to agree that the results, for the moment, defy explanation.

I concur.

Here's a screenshot of a round up of all of the latest polls from tonight, and more, to get an idea of the serious concerns here...

Original article posted here.


PoliShifter said...

I'm wondering if Hillary's camp was able to hack those machines. I wonder if we'll ever find out. Maybe 20 years from now in a historical documentary when we all think about what could have been. Similar to 2000 when we now see Bush was appointed to the Presidency by the Supreme Court and that Al Gore really won the election. How different the world would have been with a Gore Presidency.

Da Weaz said...

I cannot say for certain, but I doubt it was Billary that hacked the machines. I think it was the Diebold boys and the Rethuglican machine who would much rather an easy target than a guy like Obama who actually makes a lot of people feel good rather than sick.

Hillary is Rupert Murdoch's choice. 'Nuff said.