Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Hillary's fantasy of a biased media in the midst of ongoing silence of her rampant and easily verifiable criminality

Is there really a vast media conspiracy against Hillary?

Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!

As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama admits he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has donated to charity rather than keep

Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton, Grammy’s producer Gary Smith and Clinton intimate and fundraiser Jim Levin, for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000, which has been pending in Los Angeles since 2003, and now preparing for a November, 2008 trial has NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.

Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals relating to her efforts to use of First Amendment protections from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations to be extricated as a defendant after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004.

Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.

Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.

The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.

In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.

Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!

Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?

Will the media ever ask her about Peter Paul and the upcoming trial before the November elections?

SOURCE: Peter F. Paul

Note: For documentation, news and information on this case, you can visit:

You can also purchase the full one-hour documentary which exposes this case, and how the Clintons have threatened the media from exposing this case: Purchase Video

A trial date is expected to be announced on April 25, 2008 at a conference hearing in Los Angeles. (Three days after the Pennsylvania primaries). Will the media ever report the trial date?

Reese Hopkins of WRKO in Boston interviewed Peter Paul on February 7. You can listen to the interview here to learn more about this case: Listen Here

Original article posted here.


Anonymous said...

No one has challenged Hillary Clinton's denials that she took any money from peter Paul- who became her biggest donor in 2000 at the request of Bill Clinton and under later coercion by Hillary to continue to make secret donations to her campaign while she publicly denied them!
After her finance director was criminally tried for denying the public's right to know Peter Paul gave more than $1.2 million to Hillary's campaign- Hillary filed a 4th false FEC report on January 30, 2006 that omitted any reference again to Paul's donations- something the DOJ specifically defin ed as a crime!!!

Da Weaz said...

Agreed. This site has extensive coverage of Hillary's ties with Peter Paul. In fact, you can go here for more:

And if you want even more, click on the Hillary Clinton tag. You will get an overwhelming amount of information about why she is a disaster for America.