Saturday, June 16, 2007

SilentSuperbugs.com and Morgellons Video: Deconstructing Propaganda and Misinformation

Silentsuperbug.com, appears to be a typical "honeypot" and has produced two videos that are slickly produced, with nice pictures, but says nearly nothing. When following the video, ask the following questions as the issues arise:




What laboratory? Where?

Quorum sensing? How many people are expected to understand what this means?

From this point on, it is just a series of interesting pictures, buzzwords, and few explanations.

The end lists many supposed aspects of condition, but makes no reference to research that confirms or supports these claims. How would someone confirm the accuracy. Are we supposed to understand this from a slide show of cells? Hardly.

The site says you can "Contact Us" and then only asks you for information.

The site allows you to register, but doesn't have any features that would make registration beneficial.

When you click on Silent Superbug reference site, you find a "communication" that is as incoherent as longer videos, advertisements for Barak Obama, 1993 reports about leukemia from the Air Force Medical Center, a 1997 article about "Fusarium", and article from a range of ailments and issues. However, this information is scattered and nearly incomprehensible. This is hardly supportive of the film, other than as continuing to sow confusion.

And the final proof of the fraud is that the archives section lists 50 articles in January 2007, but if you click on any one it takes to back to the same front page. No articles. Complete bullshit. This is our intelligence operations. Completely unintelligent.

Fraudulent research site accessible here.

6 comments:

Sabrina said...

Dear Weazl,

In regard to some things you stated on your blog that you have viewed as, “bullshit” can easily be explained, and with all due respect, makes you appear overly presumptuous.

“And the final proof of the fraud is that the archives section lists 50 articles in January 2007, but if you click on any one it takes to back to the same front page. No articles. Complete bullshit.”

I am afraid that your findings here cannot in be concluded as “bullshit” at all. I have gone to the site and looked at this for myself to see if I could correlate. This is what I found to be factual.

You are correct in that if you click on the archives it will take you back to the first page, however I did take a sample of the articles listed in the said archives and found every one of them to be on the front page. They are there if you look and that is probably the reason the click will take you directly back to the first page because that is where they are to begin with. Sloppy work Weazel, sorry.

Now, I am not scientist but your question here is very puzzling to me especially since you wrote such a beautiful blog on nanotechnology and seemed to have a very good grasp on the that subject as well as many other science subjects.

You asked, “Quorum sensing? How many people are expected to understand what this means?”

This is very simple to answer. If you do not understand a term, you look it up. The silentsuperbug reference site is just that, a reference site. There you can find many articles on quorum sensing and are easily able to figure out what that means if you care to inquire about it. I myself have been able to comprehend this scientific term with very little formal education in science what so ever. So, your question is strange to me especially in light of your grasp of science as previously demonstrated in you last blog.

Here is one link from that reference site that can easily explain this if one has the capacity to comprehend.

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:oTvdtiCk0k8J:star.tau.ac.il/~eshel/papers/RNA-genome/quorum%2520sensing-2004.pdf+furanone+based+antibiotic&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=31

I can touch on a bit more later but please think about what I have presented here for now.


Thank you again for all of your time and effort and I look forward to your response.

Peace,
Sabrina

Da Weaz said...

Dear Sabrina, I am not saying that quorum sensing is not a term, what I AM saying is that the video doesn't explain much. I am asking you to ask who is the audience here? How many people will understand these terms. I am not saying that the terms do not make sense, what I am saying is that the video is fairly incoherent. As I tried to say, the entire video is filled with buzzwords that do not really "tell a story."

And yes, you are right about the articles at least BEING on the site, so I retract that part of my comment. All the other comments that I made, however, I stand by. And I ask you (or anyone else) why are so many articles so old and address such a scattering of conditions? Is he researching leukemia also? Is leukemia a "superbug"? I find this to be very strange. As well as why were there 50 articles linked to in January and only four in February and March combined, and NONE ever since. Has there been NO research worth reporting in the last three months? This I also find quite strange and is typical of sites CONSTRUCTED to give the appearance of being helpful, but not really trying to ACCOMPLISH the goal of serving as a repository of information. But maybe you can explain such a deluge of information at the start, and an absolute paucity of information going forward.

I do not think that this video is going to be useful other than to give reassurance to a very small group of people. As I said, it contains very little material from which researchers could go to further investigate these matters, and is particularly silent about where such research facility is located. And as I said, the video and the website provide almost ZERO information about the doctors, researchers or facilities, something that I find extraordinarily unusual.

Thank you for the thoughtful response. I would appreciate your further thoughts on this.

Sabrina said...

"And I ask you (or anyone else) why are so many articles so old and address such a scattering of conditions? Is he researching leukemia also? Is leukemia a "superbug"? I find this to be very strange. As well as why were there 50 articles linked to in January and only four in February and March combined, and NONE ever since. Has there been NO research worth reporting in the last three months? This I also find quite strange and is typical of sites CONSTRUCTED to give the appearance of being helpful, but not really trying to ACCOMPLISH the goal of serving as a repository of information. But maybe you can explain such a deluge of information at the start, and an absolute paucity of information going forward."

Wonderful questions Weazl! And thank you for inquiring before throwing out the insults.:)

One question at a time here ok? First of all please let me state that I do not have all the answers, I really wish I did but would be lying if I claimed that. So, to the best of my ability I will attempt to address and answer some of the issues you have inquired about.

About the scattering of conditions? Please read the case definition and perhaps that may answer a lot of questions you may have in regard to this. If syphilis and lyme have been called “the great imitator” then you can bet your bottom dollar the Fiber Disease it the “master” of them all.

In January, the site that Tamtam was posting on, the same thread I created titled, “The Fiber Disease” on biology-online.org, was targeted and locked down. So, the reason for the bulk of the articles being in January is due to the Fact that it is representative of a collection that had been accumulated through out the many, many months that thread was active. Tamtam created the silentsuperbug-reference site so to not have this information buried as it surely would have been had he not done that. I probably had an average of about one thousand hits per day on that thread which is incredible under any circumstances. Somebody felt threatened for some reason and that you can count on!

After my thread was locked down, many people were displaced and the result of being targeted was somewhat successful but not completely. At this point and time some of us began to fill in the void by doing what we could and created alternatives. This took a lot of time, work, an incredible amount of energy, and not to mention some newly acquired computer skills. In this time I created a website and a discussion forum with out any previous experience of doing either. At the same time, the silentsuperbug reference site was born.

You asked why there has been no new research within the past few months worth reporting. That question should be directed to the CDC if you ask me since they do get funded to do this very job, Tamtam does not. So what exactly are you expecting from him to begin with? Are you actually expecting one individual with no funding that I am aware of to do the job that the entire CDC has not been able to do in years but gets paid to?? Do you not agree that this is asking more than any one individual is humanly capable of to begin with? He is not God!

The new research he has recently reported on has been a confirmation that fusarium (ssp.) has indeed been confirmed in cultures of this “frankinstein creation.” Pretty impressive if you ask me but just try to get a doctor to test for it and see what happens. I guarantee you will find resistance and am 99.9% sure you will not be able to get the test ordered. This has happened to me personally and a few others. A simple test to help investigate a mystery illness is being DENIED! Why is that? Surely if we would come up positive for this test then it could in fact confirm at least some of the legitimacy of Tamtam’s work would it not? They are not allowing that to happen.

The last piece of work that Tamtam has reported on has been the presentation of his latest video. This is extremely impressive whether you understand it or not. One example in this video shows how the mold part of this creation forms into the hair of a mammal. You may not realize this but many of us have a bizarre symptom where we get hair the looks like exactly what comes from the top of our head that can manifest unattached and horizontally through the phenomena of trans-epidermal elimination. Understandably this can create trauma to an individual that witnesses this symptom and has no clue as to what is going on. Even when you do know, the trauma is still great. His video is a fine demonstration that in fact this is happening and how it happens. So if a medical professional chooses not to look at, learn from, or accept this information, then shame on them because we all lose. I know this is happening to me as I have witnessed this with my very own eyes and mark my words, one day they will be forced to look and will see it too.

Part 2 to this video is currently in the works. If we want or expect more than this then I think we need to be paying for it. Nobody that I know of has paid him a dime for this so far.

In regards to your question about leukemia? I think this question would most certainly be best directed at him to in order to obtain a cohesive and comprehensive answer. What I can say is I do know for certain that Tamtam has somehow related this pathogen to cancer research.

I do encourage you to contact him yourself here.

quorumsensing@hotmail.com

"This I also find quite strange and is typical of sites CONSTRUCTED to give the appearance of being helpful, but not really trying to ACCOMPLISH the goal of serving as a repository of information. But maybe you can explain such a deluge of information at the start, and an absolute paucity of information going forward."

In my opinion Tamtam’s research has not been paused at all as he has demonstrated this with his recent works I have stated above.

As far as giving the appearance of being helpful…..

Most all of the information found on this site

http://www.morgellons-research.org

comes directly from Tamtam’s research and findings. They have developed a product that to date has the highest success rate of any other product ever made to provide relief for this condition topically. It is called DSP cream. Even people who do not necessarily agree with Tamtam, have even shunned his work, and ridiculed him not only use the product developed directly from his research but actually have the nerve to suggest that people use it, and they even sell it too!

See this example of the hypocrites in action that will never acknowledge his work as legitimate but still have no problem from benefiting and worst of all capitalizing from it.

http://www.morgellons-disease-research.com/Morgellons-Message-Board/index.php

So appearing to be helpful and actually being helpful are two entirely different things. Whether people want to acknowledge that he has helped them or not, he sure has.

I hope this clears some thngs up for you. More later, and Weazl, thanks a lot.


Peace,
Sabrina

Sabrina said...

I just want to clarify that this website

http://www.morgellons-research.org/morgellons/

Is very representative of the best interpretation of the direct results of Tamtam’s research that we have and I want thank them for using his information to produce a product for sufferers that actually works. Kudos to our German friends!

Peace,
Sabrina

Sabrina said...

In case you did not see these here they are.

http://silentsuperbug-ecology.blogspot.com/

http://silentsuperbug-micro.blogspot.com/

http://silentsuperbug-plantinsectcelltech.blogspot.com/

http://silentsuperbug-political.blogspot.com/

Peace,
Sabrina

Da Weaz said...

Thanks