Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Ancient History Repost: George W. Bush Telling the Resistence to "Bring it on!"

WHY HAS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA FORGOTTEN?



Bring Them On' Bush Says as Iraqi Attackers Prolong War

by Michael Howard in Falluja and Julian Borger in Washington
Published on Thursday, July 3, 2003

Bring Them On' Bush Says as Iraqi Attackers Prolong War
by Michael Howard in Falluja and Julian Borger in Washington

President Bush yesterday taunted the Iraqi groups waging a guerrilla war against US and British troops, saying "bring them on" and vowing that the coalition would not be forced into an early departure.

The gesture of presidential bravado came amid declining public enthusiasm for military involvement in Iraq as American casualties continue to mount long after Mr Bush declared the war over.

The US has lost 196 soldiers in combat or accidents since going to war, a third of them since the president's victory speech on board the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier on May 1.

The troops have recently come under near daily attack from groups loyal to Saddam or simply opposed to the occupation. The tension rose yesterday in Falluja, west of Baghdad, where residents accused US forces of bombing a mosque and vowed revenge, despite American denials and claims that the mosque was a bomb-making factory.

"There are some who feel that if they attack us we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they're talking about, if that's the case," Mr Bush told journalists at the White House.

"My answer is bring them on. We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation."

US troops, the president added, would not "get nervous" and would only leave when they had accomplished their task of establishing "a free country run by the Iraqi people".

President Bush also addressed complaints that the administration misled the nation about weapons of mass destruction and Iraq's links with al-Qaida to justify the war. The rumble of discontent is far more muted than in Britain but appears to be gaining momentum.

The president said the evidence against Saddam had been good enough for his predecessor, Bill Clinton, to order the bombing of Iraq in December 1998, concluding: "The man was a threat to America. He's not a threat today."

US soldiers in Iraq sought to distance themselves from the blast at the Falluja mosque. "The explosion was apparently related to a bomb manufacturing class that was being taught inside the mosque," US central command said.

No evidence was presented to support the claim. The blast, which locals said killed nine people, including the imam, Sheikh Laith Khalil Zawba, demolished a breeze block building adjoining the Al Hassan mosque in a residential neighborhood.

Falluja residents accused US forces in the town of firing a missile at the mosque and threatened to take revenge. The charges were vehemently denied by soldiers of the US 3rd Infantry, which controls the town.

The Americans believe pockets of hardline Ba'athists and Wahabists are holed up in Falluja and are targeting soldiers and organizing sabotage attacks against key infrastructure sites.

Two rocket-propelled grenades were fired at US military vehicles on Tuesday night. No injuries were reported.

Yesterday, US soldiers patrolled the streets trying to explain their version of events to skeptical residents.

"They [the US] had been monitoring the sheikh's speeches for several weeks," said Saad Obeid, who lives near the mosque. "He had been calling for jihad and that's why they bombed."

Qahtan Adnan Al Kubeisi, 33, who lives opposite the mosque, said: "The imam was giving a regular evening prayer lesson to some Islamic students. Why should his blood be shed for that?"

He produced a shard of metal wrapped in a torn envelope which he said was debris from a missile.

Captain John Ives, the government support team leader in Falluja, denied the mosque had been watched. "We knew the imam was preaching jihad because people came in and told us," he said. "We believe in freedom of speech. They can be anti-coalition, just as you can be anti the US president. There is no way we would target a mosque.

Original article posted here.

Then look at the resistence message made back in 2004, and ask yourself who was more honest and accurate

No comments: