Weazl received a BA in Economics with an emphasis on developing countries from Yale University in the late 80's, then received his JD from Columbia Law School in the early 90's. He has practiced as both a corporate lawyer and as a criminal lawyer for nearly a decade, but currently tries to balance an interest in the esoteric with a need to decipher the moment, howling to the moon that the ship is sinking.
It's quite clear that the sheeple don't wanna see that they don't wanna see. And it's this old idea that only a Nazi can be evil, and nobody else can be so bad. But Nazi's pooped, pee'ed and ate just like everyone else. And Nazi's even looked like some of the people now:
http://www.dnash.org/fark/nazi-twins.jpg
So I'm right there with you, Soc.
And the physics of the thing is the biggest proof, and there are too many things that one could talk about, the simplest being that if gas doesn't burn hotter than the melting point of steel, that it couldn't have caused the collapse. But there are many other obvious things, such as if the stucture of the building had been damaged by the impact of the plane, there would have been a tip over collapse on the side of the impact, not a straight down implosion. Anybody ever cut down a tree? Since when does a tree collapse straight down and disappear upon some strong axe hits? Only the foolish haven't figured this out.
1 comment:
I've said it a million times, Soc, these idiots can't do anything correctly. I've included links to many of these things you mention.
See:
http://weazlsrevenge.blogspot.com/2006/04/911-smoke-and-mirrors.html
It's quite clear that the sheeple don't wanna see that they don't wanna see. And it's this old idea that only a Nazi can be evil, and nobody else can be so bad. But Nazi's pooped, pee'ed and ate just like everyone else. And Nazi's even looked like some of the people now:
http://www.dnash.org/fark/nazi-twins.jpg
So I'm right there with you, Soc.
And the physics of the thing is the biggest proof, and there are too many things that one could talk about, the simplest being that if gas doesn't burn hotter than the melting point of steel, that it couldn't have caused the collapse. But there are many other obvious things, such as if the stucture of the building had been damaged by the impact of the plane, there would have been a tip over collapse on the side of the impact, not a straight down implosion. Anybody ever cut down a tree? Since when does a tree collapse straight down and disappear upon some strong axe hits? Only the foolish haven't figured this out.
Post a Comment